#education Next in line for #disruption coming from new #technologies and Massive Open Online Class #edchat

Napster, Udacity, and the Academy

by Clay Shirky November 12, 2012

Fifteen years ago, a research group called The Fraunhofer Institute announced a new digital format for compressing movie files. This wasn’t a terribly momentous invention, but it did have one interesting side effect: Fraunhofer also had to figure out how to compress the soundtrack. The result was the Motion Picture Experts Group Format 1, Audio Layer III, a format you know and love, though only by its acronym, MP3.

The recording industry concluded this new audio format would be no threat, because quality mattered most. Who would listen to an MP3 when they could buy a better-sounding CD at the record store? Then Napster launched, and quickly became the fastest-growing piece of software in history. The industry sued Napster and won, and it collapsed even more suddenly than it had arisen.

If Napster had only been about free access, control of legal distribution of music would then have returned the record labels. That’s not what happened. Instead, Pandora happened. Last.fm happened. Spotify happened. ITunes happened. Amazon began selling songs in the hated MP3 format.

How did the recording industry win the battle but lose the war? How did they achieve such a decisive victory over Napster, then fail to regain control of even legal distribution channels? They crushed Napster’s organization. They poisoned Napster’s brand. They outlawed Napster’s tools. The one thing they couldn’t kill was the story Napster told.

The story the recording industry used to tell us went something like this: “Hey kids, Alanis Morisette just recorded three kickin’ songs! You can have them, so long as you pay for the ten mediocrities she recorded at the same time.” Napster told us a different story. Napster said “You want just the three songs? Fine. Just ‘You Oughta Know’? No problem. Every cover of ‘Blue Suede Shoes’ ever made? Help yourself. You’re in charge.”

The people in the music industry weren’t stupid, of course. They had access to the same internet the rest of us did. They just couldn’t imagine—and I mean this in the most ordinarily descriptive way possible—could not imagine that the old way of doing things might fail. Yet things did fail, in large part because, after Napster, the industry’s insistence that digital distribution be as expensive and inconvenient as a trip to the record store suddenly struck millions of people as a completely terrible idea.

Once you see this pattern—a new story rearranging people’s sense of the possible, with the incumbents the last to know—you see it everywhere. First, the people running the old system don’t notice the change. When they do, they assume it’s minor. Then that it’s a niche. Then a fad. And by the time they understand that the world has actually changed, they’ve squandered most of the time they had to adapt.

It’s been interesting watching this unfold in music, books, newspapers, TV, but nothing has ever been as interesting to me as watching it happen in my own backyard. Higher education is now being disrupted; our MP3 is the massive open online course (or MOOC), and our Napster is Udacity, the education startup.

We have several advantages over the recording industry, of course. We are decentralized and mostly non-profit. We employ lots of smart people. We have previous examples to learn from, and our core competence is learning from the past. And armed with these advantages, we’re probably going to screw this up as badly as the music people did.

* * *

A massive open online class is usually a series of video lectures with associated written materials and self-scoring tests, open to anyone. That’s what makes them OOCs. The M part, though, comes from the world. As we learned from Wikipedia, demand for knowledge is so enormous that good, free online materials can attract extraordinary numbers of people from all over the world.

Last year, Introduction to Artificial Intelligence, an online course from Stanford taught by Peter Norvig and Sebastian Thrun, attracted 160,000 potential students, of whom 23,000 completed it, a scale that dwarfs anything possible on a physical campus. As Thrun put it, “Peter and I taught more students AI, than all AI professors in the world combined.” Seeing this, he quit and founded Udacity, an educational institution designed to offer MOOCs.

The size of Thrun and Norvig’s course, and the attention attracted by Udacity (and similar organizations like Coursera, P2PU, and University of the People), have many academics worrying about the effect on higher education. The loudest such worrying so far has been The Trouble With Online Education, a New York Times OpEd by Mark Edmunson of the University of Virginia. As most critics do, Edmundson focussed on the issue of quality, asking and answering his own question: “[C]an online education ever be education of the very best sort?”

Now you and I know what he means by “the very best sort”—the intimate college seminar, preferably conducted by tenured faculty. He’s telling the story of the liberal arts education in a selective residential college and asking “Why would anyone take an online class when they can buy a better education at UVA?”

But who faces that choice? Are we to imagine an 18 year old who can set aside $250K and 4 years, but who would have a hard time choosing between a residential college and a series of MOOCs? Elite high school students will not be abandoning elite colleges any time soon; the issue isn’t what education of “the very best sort” looks like, but what the whole system looks like.

Edmundson isn’t crazy enough to argue that all college experiences are good, so he hedges. He tells us “Every memorable class is a bit like a jazz composition”, without providing an analogy for the non-memorable ones. He assures us that “large lectures can also create genuine intellectual community”, which of course means they can alsonot do that. (He doesn’t say how many large lectures fail his test.) He says “real courses create intellectual joy,” a statement that can be accurate only as a tautology. (The MOOC Criticism Drinking Game: take a swig whenever someone says “real”, “true”, or “genuine” to hide the fact that they are only talking about elite schools instead of the median college experience.)

I was fortunate enough to get the kind of undergraduate education Edmundson praises: four years at Yale, in an incredible intellectual community, where even big lecture classes were taught by seriously brilliant people. Decades later, I can still remember my art history professor’s description of the Arnolfini Wedding, and the survey of modern poetry didn’t just expose me to Ezra Pound and HD, it changed how I thought about the 20th century.

But you know what? Those classes weren’t like jazz compositions. They didn’t create genuine intellectual community. They didn’t even create ersatz intellectual community. They were just great lectures: we showed up, we listened, we took notes, and we left, ready to discuss what we’d heard in smaller sections.

And did the professors also teach our sections too? No, of course not; those were taught by graduate students. Heaven knows what they were being paid to teach us, but it wasn’t a big fraction of a professor’s salary. The large lecture isn’t a tool for producing intellectual joy; it’s a tool for reducing the expense of introductory classes.

* * *

Higher education has a bad case of cost disease (sometimes called Baumol’s cost disease, after one of its theorizers.) The classic example is the string quartet; performing a 15-minute quartet took a cumulative hour of musician time in 1850, and takes that same hour today. This is not true of the production of food, or clothing, or transportation, all of which have seen massive increases in value created per hour of labor. Unfortunately, the obvious ways to make production more efficient—fewer musicians playing faster—wouldn’t work as well for the production of music as for the production of cars.

An organization with cost disease can use lower paid workers, increase the number of consumers per worker, subsidize production, or increase price. For live music, this means hiring less-talented musicians, selling more tickets per performance, writing grant applications, or, of course, raising ticket prices. For colleges, this means more graduate and adjunct instructors, increased enrollments and class size, fundraising, or, of course, raising tuition.

The great work on college and cost-disease is Robert Archibald and David Feldman’s Why Does College Cost So Much? Archibald and Feldman conclude that institution-specific explanations—spoiled students expecting a climbing wall; management self-aggrandizement at the expense of educational mission—hold up less well than the generic observation: colleges need a lot of highly skilled people, people whose wages, benefits, and support costs have risen faster than inflation for the last thirty years.

Cheap graduate students let a college lower the cost of teaching the sections while continuing to produce lectures as an artisanal product, from scratch, on site, real time. The minute you try to explain exactly why we do it this way, though, the setup starts to seem a little bizarre. What would it be like to teach at a university where a you could only assign books you yourself had written? Where you could only ask your students to read journal articles written by your fellow faculty members? Ridiculous. Unimaginable.

Every college provides access to a huge collection of potential readings, and to a tiny collection of potential lectures. We ask students to read the best works we can find, whoever produced them and where, but we only ask them to listen to the best lecture a local employee can produce that morning. Sometimes you’re at a place where the best lecture your professor can give is the best in the world. But mostly not. And the only thing that kept this system from seeming strange was that we’ve never had a good way of publishing lectures.

This is the huge difference between music and education. Starting with Edison’s wax cylinders, and continuing through to Pandora and the iPod, the biggest change in musical consumption has come not from production but playback. Hearing an excellent string quartet play live in an intimate venue has indeed become a very expensive proposition, as cost disease would suggest, but at the same time, the vast majority of music listened to on any given day is no longer recreated live.

* * *

Harvard, where I was fortunate enough to have a visiting lectureship a couple of years ago, is our agreed-upon Best Institution, and it is indeed an extraordinary place. But this very transcendence should make us suspicious. Harvard’s endowment, 31 billion dollars, is over three hundred times the median, and only one college in five has an endowment in the first place. Harvard also educates only about a tenth of a percent of the 18 million or so students enrolled in higher education in any given year. Any sentence that begins “Let’s take Harvard as an example…” should immediately be followed up with “No, let’s not do that.”

This atypical bent of our elite institutions covers more than just Harvard. The top 50 colleges on the US News and World Report list (which includes most of the ones you’ve heard of) only educate something like 3% of the current student population. The entire list, about 250 colleges, educates fewer than 25%.

The upper reaches of the US college system work like a potlatch, those festivals of ostentatious giving. The very things the US News list of top colleges prizes—low average class size, ratio of staff to students—mean that any institution that tries to create a cost-effective education will move down the list. This is why most of the early work on MOOCs is coming out of Stanford and Harvard and MIT. As Ian Bogost says,MOOCs are marketing for elite schools.

Outside the elite institutions, though, the other 75% of students—over 13 million of them—are enrolled in the four thousand institutions youhaven’t heard of: Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College. Bridgerland Applied Technology College. The Laboratory Institute of Merchandising. When we talk about college education in the US, these institutions are usually left out of the conversation, but Clayton State educates as many undergraduates as Harvard. Saint Leo educates twice as many. City College of San Francisco enrolls as many as the entire Ivy League combined. These are where most students are, and their experience is what college education is mostly like.

* * *

The fight over MOOCs isn’t about the value of college; a good chunk of the four thousand institutions you haven’t heard of provide an expensive but mediocre education. For-profit schools like Kaplan’s and the University of Phoenix enroll around one student in eight, butaccount for nearly half of all loan defaults, and the vast majority of their enrollees fail to get a degree even after six years. Reading the academic press, you wouldn’t think that these statistics represented a more serious defection from our mission than helping people learn something about Artificial Intelligence for free.

The fight over MOOCs isn’t even about the value of online education. Hundreds of institutions already offer online classes for credit, and half a million students are already enrolled in them. If critics of online education were consistent, they would believe that the University of Virginia’s Bachelor of Interdisciplinary Studies or Rutger’s MLIS degreeare abominations, or else they would have to believe that there is a credit-worthy way to do online education, one MOOCs could emulate. Neither argument is much in evidence.

That’s because the fight over MOOCs is really about the story we tell ourselves about higher education: what it is, who it’s for, how it’s delivered, who delivers it. The most widely told story about college focuses obsessively on elite schools and answers a crazy mix of questions: How will we teach complex thinking and skills? How will we turn adolescents into well-rounded members of the middle class? Who will certify that education is taking place? How will we instill reverence for Virgil? Who will subsidize the professor’s work?

MOOCs simply ignore a lot of those questions. The possibility MOOCs hold out isn’t replacement; anything that could replace the traditional college experience would have to work like one, and the institutions best at working like a college are already colleges. The possibility MOOCs hold out is that the educational parts of education can be unbundled. MOOCs expand the audience for education to people ill-served or completely shut out from the current system, in the same way phonographs expanded the audience for symphonies to people who couldn’t get to a concert hall, and PCs expanded the users of computing power to people who didn’t work in big companies.

Those earlier inventions systems started out markedly inferior to the high-cost alternative: records were scratchy, PCs were crashy. But first they got better, then they got better than that, and finally, they got so good, for so cheap, that they changed people’s sense of what was possible.

In the US, an undergraduate education used to be an option, one way to get into the middle class. Now it’s a hostage situation, required to avoid falling out of it. And if some of the hostages having trouble coming up with the ransom conclude that our current system is a completely terrible idea, then learning will come unbundled from the pursuit of a degree just as as songs came unbundled from CDs.

If this happens, Harvard will be fine. Yale will be fine, and Stanford, and Swarthmore, and Duke. But Bridgerland Applied Technology College? Maybe not fine. University of Arkansas at Little Rock? Maybe not fine. And Kaplan College, a more reliable producer of debt than education? Definitely not fine.

* * *

Udacity and its peers don’t even pretend to tell the story of an 18-year old earning a Bachelor’s degree in four years from a selective college, a story that only applies to a small minority of students in the US, much less the world. Meanwhile, they try to answer some new questions, questions that the traditional academy—me and my people—often don’t even recognize as legitimate, like “How do we spin up 10,000 competent programmers a year, all over the world, at a cost too cheap to meter?”

Udacity may or may not survive, but as with Napster, there’s no containing the story it tells: “It’s possible to educate a thousand people at a time, in a single class, all around the world, for free.” To a traditional academic, this sounds like crazy talk. Earlier this fall, a math instructor writing under the pen name Delta enrolled in Thrun’sStatistics 101 class, and, after experiencing it first-hand, concluded that the course was

…amazingly, shockingly awful. It is poorly structured; it evidences an almost complete lack of planning for the lectures; it routinely fails to properly define or use standard terms or notation; it necessitates occasional massive gaps where “magic” happens; and it results in nonstandard computations that would not be accepted in normal statistical work.

Delta posted ten specific criticisms of the content (Normal Curve Calculations), teaching methods (Quiz Regime) and the MOOC itself (Lack of Updates). About this last one, Delta said:

So in theory, any of the problems that I’ve noted above could be revisited and fixed on future pass-throughs of the course. But will that happen at Udacity, or any other massive online academic program?

The very next day, Thrun answered that question. Conceding that Delta “points out a number of shortcomings that warrant improvements”, Thrun detailed how they were going to update the class. Delta, to his credit, then noted that Thrun had answered several of his criticisms, and went on to tell a depressing story of a fellow instructor at his own institution who had failed to define the mathematical terms he was using despite student requests.

Tellingly, when Delta was criticizing his peer, he didn’t name the professor, the course, or even his institution. He could observe every aspect of Udacity’s Statistics 101 (as can you) and discuss them in public, but when criticizing his own institution, he pulled his punches.

Open systems are open. For people used to dealing with institutions that go out of their way to hide their flaws, this makes these systems look terrible at first. But anyone who has watched a piece of open source software improve, or remembers the Britannica people throwing tantrums about Wikipedia, has seen how blistering public criticism makes open systems better. And once you imagine educating a thousand people in a single class, it becomes clear that open courses, even in their nascent state, will be able to raise quality and improve certification faster than traditional institutions can lower cost or increase enrollment.

College mottos run the gamut from Bryn Mawr’s Veritatem Dilexi (I Delight In The Truth) to the Laboratory Institute of Merchandising’sWhere Business Meets Fashion, but there’s a new one that now hangs over many of them: Quae Non Possunt Non Manent. Things That Can’t Last Don’t. The cost of attending college is rising above inflation every year, while the premium for doing so shrinks. This obviously can’t last, but no one on the inside has any clear idea about how to change the way our institutions work while leaving our benefits and privileges intact.

In the academy, we lecture other people every day about learning from history. Now its our turn, and the risk is that we’ll be the last to know that the world has changed, because we can’t imagine—really cannot imagine—that story we tell ourselves about ourselves could start to fail. Even when it’s true. Especially when it’s true.

32 commenti

Archiviato in Ed Tech, English

32 risposte a “#education Next in line for #disruption coming from new #technologies and Massive Open Online Class #edchat

  1. Pingback: #edchat Massive Open Online Courses: A reply to Clay Shirky | la scuola è una cosa seria

  2. Pingback: #edchat Following up discussion on #education #disruption from Massive Open Online Courses | la scuola è una cosa seria

  3. Pingback: #edchat Another reply to #clayshirky #education #disruption article | la scuola è una cosa seria

  4. Pingback: #edchat How the For-Profit College Can Destroy your Life | la scuola è una cosa seria

  5. It’s going to be end of mine day, however before finish I am reading this great article to improve my know-how.

  6. 4) In the winter, poorly insulated pipes can freeze and
    burst, sending water flying everywhere. If your house
    is prone to a natural disaster, like an earthquake or flood,
    then it would be wise for you to get a home insurance plan that covers that occurrence.
    They’re a number of very good questions and determined by what you read the replies will vary.

  7. When the average man in the street takes his pay packet
    home, he finds that his employer has deducted certain taxes and
    he receives only a net amount after P. The payment done by the insured is called a premium.

    Use a service such as ours to compare rate quotes
    from different companies if YOUR area.

  8. Have you ever considered about adding a little bit more than just your articles?

    I mean, what you say is valuable and everything. But think of if you added some great photos or
    video clips to give your posts more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but with
    images and videos, this website could definitely be one of the most beneficial in
    its niche. Very good blog!

  9. Thus, be aware of these specifics while analyzing the home insurance quotes.
    While gathering quotes, ask about combining all of your insurance policies with the same insurance company.

    Home Security devices: Investment in home security devices helps you
    bring down the home insurance premium as these devices are aimed at making
    your home safe.

  10. The cost of property also depends on the place where it is located.
    Here are recommended pages for home insurance quotes.
    Once you have found the best quotation for your home, then you can compare the prices with
    the different companies that sell the assurance.

  11. Typically the annual premiums for homeowner’s insurance depend on all of the following:The state in which the property is located – The age of the property – The value of the property – The condition of the property – The deductible amount – Home owners looking to reduce their annual premiums can begin by making improvements to the property, especially those improvements that add to the overall safety of the home. You do it for everything else, why wouldn’t
    you find the best deal for you. Of course, home insurance is
    also really great when you have little emergencies that
    happen.

  12. Now, everybody can get home insurance quotes online.
    If you have detailed documentation that demonstrates the safety standards of your home, you may be able to see lower
    priced home insurance for it. Try to institute some
    of them today and you will go far in making your
    home happier, safer and less expensive to insure.

  13. I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own blog and was wondering what all is required to get set up? I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny?
    I’m not very internet smart so I’m not 100% certain.
    Any tips or advice would be greatly appreciated. Thank you

  14. When working individually from home as a claims processor it is best to specialize in
    one or two insurance areas. It makes sense to have at least a slight idea of what you’re looking for before you begin looking.

    on both premiums and policy amounts because you have invested in your.

  15. TOP TEN CARS TO RENT IN LUXURY OR EXOTICS CATEGORY.
    Make sure you include everything in your loss estimate. You must not be using the vehicle for carrying passengers
    or goods for hire or reward.

  16. There can be massive differences between the
    lowest and highest car insurance quotes for exactly the
    same car and driver(s). The taxi duly arrived, swung into the driveway, skidded on the ice and crashed into the parked car.
    In order to be eligible for the discount, you happen to be
    entitled to this discount only when your yearly mileage will
    not exceed 7,500 miles annually in order to secure this sort of price break.

  17. Shopping for auto insurance for older vehicles can
    be stressful. Factors like the possibility of having an accident, the number of auto
    thieves or vandals, and the possibility of a natural disaster may come into play.
    The $1,000 you paid was used to pay-off interest
    for the month and in this case, it resulted to a default of
    $166.

  18. You can easily pick and drop your child when you are going and coming back from your job.
    It pays to shop around when finding the right policy for your classic vehicle.

    For example, you may need to budget because of your daughter’s dance class or a weekly allowance for younger kids.

  19. Cash value life insurance, which is really what we’re talking about here, is investment grade for only one party, the insurance company. If you quit smoking, your insurance rates can be cut by upto 50% because it would reduce chances of future health complications However, it would not be wise to hide any such factors form your insurer, because it can affect the outcome of the policy adversely. A period of five years to seven years would be enough to support them and after this period of time they are at least well adjusted to the situation and can now support themselves fairly well.

  20. Older drivers who take refresher-driving courses after a period
    of absence from the roads can get a considerable discount
    on their car insurance premium for completing the training.
    Even cheap car insurance will meet the car insurance guidelines for auto drivers.
    If so, you may be able to get a discount on your auto insurance, this discount is available from
    many companies.

  21. This would enable the person too be in a state of great psychological relief.
    50 per month, up to 50,000 Legal Assistanc at 1.

    You will be able to see all these details through customer complaints amongst other things.

  22. Insurance companies tend to charge a higgher premium when it comes to mortgaged properties.
    Which is why our Hoome Insurance includes accidental damage as standard.

    When applying for home insurance, it is also a good idea to look for any discolunts that
    may apply if you have multiple contracts maintained under the saje policy.

  23. Here’s what you can do if you’re sick and tired of waitijng around for your insurer to get the message.
    Specialists could be seen which has a referral from a Primary Care Giver.
    You can also see if iit is possible to expand
    your current cover to be more comprehensive aand enjoy
    greater peace of mind as a consequence.

  24. The way in which these rates are determined is through published depreciation tables.
    Most of the landlords will demnand a guarantor who has a solid livelihood and owwns a real
    estate. Eaach auto insurance policy has six different types
    of coverage.

  25. You’d be the wiser if you take time to check into
    which business you should be getting it from. Insurance companies
    know that the presence of such systems lower the probability of your home being
    broken into. They have different usage and have different policies, coverage and
    rates according to their usage.

  26. Discounts can maximize your savings and help you get a cheap car insurance.
    Best bases its rating on Primerica’s “leading position in the U. This is due to the laws that prohibit minors from receiving proceeds of IRA accounts and life insurance policies.

  27. These do not only give greater sdcurity for the teens but cann also slash a large amount offf
    from the insurance costs involved. There are a lot of reckless drivers out there, and there is a greaat chance of
    your coming into contact with them whenever you get
    into your car and drive off. There isn’t really a brief response to that as there’s much to consider when looking at every insurance.

  28. A place is most likely the most dear asset for many folks therefore getting it right from thee start is vital.

    So by them all paying a little for their
    insurance, the insurance company cann payy for the events that happen too the few.
    Your non-involvement in traffic violations or other illegal driving issues will ensre that
    you receive insurance at lesser premium quotes.

  29. Then compare each car insurance company’s offering.
    Since no one website compares all of the different insurance
    companies operating in this state, if you really
    and truly want to get cheap car insurance online in Florida you’ll have to make your compparisons on at least 3 different sitws
    – but the boottom line is, once you have made your comparisons
    you can rest comfortably knowing that you have grabbed the very best price for
    car insurance that you’ll ever find here in Florida. Even
    if you think that you are a great driver and
    can do no wrong, you can get involved in an accident due to somebody else’s fault.

  30. I’m not that much of a online reader to be honest but your blogs really nice, keep it
    up!I’ll go ahead and bookmark your website to come back later.
    Cheers

  31. Fantastic beat ! I wish to apprentice while you amend your web site,
    how could i subscribe for a blog web site? The account aided me a acceptable deal.

    I had been tiny bit acquainted of this your broadcast offered bright clear concept

  32. What’s up everybody, here every person is sharing these knowledge,
    so it’s good to read this website, and I used to pay
    a vist this web site everyday.

Lascia un commento

Inserisci i tuoi dati qui sotto o clicca su un'icona per effettuare l'accesso:

Logo WordPress.com

Stai commentando usando il tuo account WordPress.com. Chiudi sessione / Modifica )

Foto Twitter

Stai commentando usando il tuo account Twitter. Chiudi sessione / Modifica )

Foto di Facebook

Stai commentando usando il tuo account Facebook. Chiudi sessione / Modifica )

Google+ photo

Stai commentando usando il tuo account Google+. Chiudi sessione / Modifica )

Connessione a %s...